Events in Goa

Last Call for Tomorrow: Rethinking Digital Futures at Museum of Goa


Panaji, September 2025: What happens when technologies meant to make life safer and more efficient end up controlling it instead? This question anchored Last Call for Tomorrow, a compelling session held during MOG Sunday at the Museum of Goa. The event featured the screening of TAAK, a thought-provoking film by director Udit Khurana, followed by a panel discussion on the growing role of surveillance in everyday life.

Presented by the Museum of Imagined Futures (MOIF) in collaboration with the Storiculture Impact Fellowship, the event delved into how digitalisation subtly but profoundly impacts our personal freedoms โ€” especially for workers in vulnerable positions.

TAAK, set in the world of night-shift security personnel, follows the story of workers compelled to wear tracking devices. While marketed as tools for โ€œsafety,โ€ these devices steadily erode autonomy, creating an environment of suspicion and coercion.

Film producer Mathivanan Rajendran explained, โ€œTechnology is rarely neutral. It comes embedded with power structures. We need to ask โ€” safety for whom, and at what cost?โ€ His comments struck a chord with attendees, who resonated with the idea that technologies often serve interests far removed from those most affected by them.

Vedika Pareek, representing Storiculture’s business and legal vertical, emphasised the need to use storytelling as a way to raise difficult but necessary questions. โ€œCinema can create empathy, but the real conversation happens afterwards โ€” in spaces like this,โ€ she said, noting how inclusive dialogue is key to reimagining the future.

The discussion, moderated informally with audience participation, also included insights from Karan Saini, a public interest technologist, who warned that what begins as workplace efficiency can morph into lifestyle control. โ€œThese technologies donโ€™t just monitor how we work โ€” they begin to decide how we live,โ€ he cautioned.

The session highlighted the unequal effects of digitalisation โ€” where tech may mean convenience for some, but surveillance and loss of agency for others. Particularly in Indiaโ€™s expanding gig and service economies, workers often face mandatory compliance with little room for consent.

The panellists collectively urged the audience not to treat digitalisation as destiny. Instead, they advocated for proactive, ethical interventions that prioritise human dignity, consent, and justice in the design and deployment of technology.

Last Call for Tomorrow is part of a larger initiative by MOIF to democratise conversations about the future. By combining art, film, and dialogue, the series encourages citizens, creatives, and technologists to pause and reflect before passively accepting the next wave of tech-driven change.

TechPulse

Google Ordered to Pay $12,500 for Street View Privacy Breach Involving Naked Man in Yard


July 30, 2025 โ€” In a ruling that has reignited global debates on privacy and digital surveillance, Google has been ordered to pay $12,500 in damages after an image on Street View showed a man naked in his own yardโ€”without his knowledge or consent.

The man, whose identity has been withheld for privacy reasons, filed a complaint after discovering the image of himself online. The photo, which was briefly accessible on Googleโ€™s Street View platform, showed him in a private moment on his residential property. Despite Google’s attempts to blur identifying features, the image remained recognizable to some viewers.

A Question of Consent

While Googleโ€™s Street View service is known for capturing public roads and urban spaces, this case challenges how the platform defines private versus public spaces, especially when high-resolution imagery captures individuals in vulnerable or unintended moments.

Legal experts said the ruling sets a precedent for accountability in digital mapping and highlights the need for stricter privacy protocols in the age of automated image collection.

Googleโ€™s Response

A spokesperson for Google expressed regret over the incident, stating:

โ€œWe take privacy seriously and work to prevent these situations through advanced blurring technologies. We acknowledge the lapse in this case and will ensure the image is permanently removed.โ€

The company also confirmed a review of its Street View processes and escalation mechanisms for privacy-related flags.

Bigger Picture: Tech and Ethics

This is not the first time Googleโ€™s mapping platforms have come under scrutiny. Past incidents have raised concerns about facial recognition, license plate visibility, and location-based profiling. While the service remains a powerful tool for navigation and exploration, it is now equally central to discussions around privacy, consent, and digital ethics.

What This Means for You

  • If you appear in a Street View image, you have the right to request it be blurred or taken down.
  • Private property visibilityโ€”even from a public roadโ€”can be contested under certain privacy laws.
  • This case may prompt greater user control and regulatory oversight for map-based services.

๐Ÿ“– For more on privacy rights, digital ethics, and tech accountability, visit allycaral.com