Tag: Supreme Court India

Films

SC Refuses Ban on Yadav Ji Ki Love Story, Says Title Not Defamatory

Tanisha Cardozo

In a significant development highlighting the intersection of cinema and constitutional rights, the Supreme Court of India has refused to impose a ban on the film Yadav Ji Ki Love Story, dismissing a petition that challenged its title. The plea, filed by the chief of the Vishwa Yadav Parishad, argued that the film’s name portrayed the Yadav community in a negative light and sought either a ban or a change in the title.

Hearing the matter, a bench comprising Justices BV Nagarathna and Ujjal Bhuyan examined the arguments and the material presented before them. The court ultimately found the concerns to be unfounded, stating that the title of the film did not contain any language or implication that could be seen as derogatory towards the Yadav community.

Justice Nagarathna observed that the court could not understand how the title alone could reflect negatively on an entire community, especially when it lacked any explicit or implied negative descriptors. The bench emphasised that none of the reasonable restrictions outlined under Article 19(2) of the Constitution—which governs limitations on freedom of speech and expression—were applicable in this case.

The court also drew a distinction between this matter and a previous controversy surrounding the film Ghooskhor Pandat. In that instance, the word “ghooskhor,” meaning corrupt, was deemed to carry a clearly negative connotation that could reflect poorly on a community, prompting judicial intervention. However, in the present case, the bench noted that no such negative association existed in the title Yadav Ji Ki Love Story.

During the proceedings, the petitioner’s counsel clarified that their objection was not to inter-community relationships depicted in the film, but rather to how certain aspects, including the portrayal of a woman, were handled. Despite these arguments, the court maintained that the film is a work of fiction and does not warrant judicial interference based on speculative concerns.

With the petition dismissed, the path is now clear for the film’s release, scheduled for February 27. The ruling reinforces the judiciary’s stance on protecting creative expression while carefully weighing claims of community harm, once again underlining the importance of context and intent in such disputes.

National

Rajasthan Takes the First Stance to Implement Supreme Court Orders on Feeding Stray Dogs

Tanisha Cardozo

Written by Intern Queeny George M.H , Team Allycaral

Rajasthan has become the first and only state in India to actively implement the Supreme Court’s orders on the feeding of stray dogs. This move comes after months of national-level debate around whether feeding strays in public spaces is a right or a nuisance. The Supreme Court eventually took up the matter with seriousness, emphasizing that a humane, regulated, and public-health-conscious approach must be taken.

Acting on this, Rajasthan has begun setting up designated ‘feeding spots’ across urban areas, specifically for stray dogs, often referred to as Indies. These spots will not only ensure that feeding is carried out in an orderly and hygienic manner but also serve as a location point for further care — such as vaccinations and sterilisation. This aligns with the court’s recommendation to both feed and control the population through responsible methods.

India’s stray dog population is a staggering one. As per varying data, the number ranges anywhere between 15 million to nearly 60 million. With such numbers, concerns over animal health, public sanitation, and human-animal conflict are understandable. However, Rajasthan’s initiative is an example of balancing empathy with action.

This thoughtful step reflects a friendlier attitude toward street animals while still addressing public safety concerns. It affirms the understanding that stray dogs, though ownerless, are still living beings deserving of structured care and kindness. The decision to introduce feeding zones makes Rajasthan the first mover in a nationwide conversation around animal rights, urban responsibility, and compassionate coexistence.

As India continues to urbanize, such policies may well become essential parts of modern civic planning. Rajasthan has shown that compassion and governance can go hand in hand — and perhaps other states will soon follow.

Social

Vantara Offers Support for Madhuri’s Return to Kolhapur, Proposes Satellite Rehabilitation Centre

Tanisha Cardozo

In a major development following a Supreme Court ruling and widespread public demonstrations, Reliance Group’s animal rescue initiative Vantara has issued a detailed statement offering full support for the return of 36-year-old elephant Madhuri, also known as Mahadevi, to her spiritual home at Nandani Math in Kolhapur.

🐘 Background: Legal and Public Outcry

Madhuri, revered by the local Jain community, was relocated to Vantara’s wildlife care facility in Jamnagar, Gujarat, following orders from the Bombay High Court and upheld by the Supreme Court of India. The relocation stemmed from a PETA petition that highlighted years of neglect, chaining, and a 2017 incident where Madhuri tragically killed the Math’s priest.

Despite the legal mandates, public sentiment in Kolhapur erupted. Over 30,000 people joined a 45-kilometre silent march. The protests also triggered a telecom boycott, with more than 1.5 lakh users switching from Jio in protest.

📜 Vantara’s Statement

Led by Anant Ambani, Vantara clarified that the organisation:

  • Acted strictly in compliance with court directions
  • Did not request or initiate Madhuri’s relocation
  • Acknowledges the deep cultural and religious significance of the elephant to Kolhapur’s Jain Matha

“We acted only as per judicial direction. If our involvement has caused any distress, we sincerely regret it. Michhami Dukkadam — we seek forgiveness,” the statement read.

🛖 A New Proposal: Satellite Rehabilitation Centre in Kolhapur

Vantara has offered to establish a satellite rehabilitation facility for Madhuri, in collaboration with the Jain Matha and the Government of Maharashtra.

Proposed Features:

  • 🐘 Hydrotherapy Pond for joint pain relief
  • 🌊 Swimming Waterbody for exercise
  • 💡 Laser Therapy for rehabilitation
  • 🛌 Covered Night Shelters for comfort
  • 🌿 Lush Open Spaces (chain-free environment)
  • 🏖️ Sand Pits for enrichment & stress reduction
  • 🏥 24×7 Veterinary Clinic
  • 🪵 Rubberised Platforms & Resting Mounds for arthritis and foot rot recovery

“We do not seek credit. This is not a condition, only a recommendation aligned with best welfare practices,” clarified the Vantara team.

🔁 The Road Ahead

Maharashtra CM Devendra Fadnavis has stated the government will approach the court again. Vantara has committed to fully supporting any application filed by the Jain Matha and the State.

The land for the facility is to be identified in consultation with all stakeholders. Subject to approvals, Vantara is ready to begin technical and veterinary implementation immediately.

📣 Community Reaction & Closing Note

The Vantara statement has received mixed reactions online, with some praising its balanced approach and others still demanding immediate return of the elephant. The sensitive issue now rests in the hands of the Supreme Court, which will decide on the final course of action.