Actor Rajpal Yadav surrendered to the Tihar Jail authorities in Delhi on Thursday following the Delhi High Court’s refusal to grant him any relief in connection with his cheque-bounce cases. The court had earlier rejected the actor’s plea seeking an extension of the deadline for his surrender.
According to a report by news agency PTI, a jail source confirmed that Yadav surrendered before the jail authorities at around 4 pm on Thursday. “He surrendered before the jail authorities at 4 pm on Thursday. Now the jail authorities will follow the standard operating procedure,” the source said.
With the surrender completed, jail authorities are expected to proceed in accordance with established protocols as the legal process continues in the matter.
July 30, 2025 — In a ruling that has reignited global debates on privacy and digital surveillance, Google has been ordered to pay $12,500 in damages after an image on Street View showed a man naked in his own yard—without his knowledge or consent.
The man, whose identity has been withheld for privacy reasons, filed a complaint after discovering the image of himself online. The photo, which was briefly accessible on Google’s Street View platform, showed him in a private moment on his residential property. Despite Google’s attempts to blur identifying features, the image remained recognizable to some viewers.
A Question of Consent
While Google’s Street View service is known for capturing public roads and urban spaces, this case challenges how the platform defines private versus public spaces, especially when high-resolution imagery captures individuals in vulnerable or unintended moments.
Legal experts said the ruling sets a precedent for accountability in digital mapping and highlights the need for stricter privacy protocols in the age of automated image collection.
Google’s Response
A spokesperson for Google expressed regret over the incident, stating:
“We take privacy seriously and work to prevent these situations through advanced blurring technologies. We acknowledge the lapse in this case and will ensure the image is permanently removed.”
The company also confirmed a review of its Street View processes and escalation mechanisms for privacy-related flags.
Bigger Picture: Tech and Ethics
This is not the first time Google’s mapping platforms have come under scrutiny. Past incidents have raised concerns about facial recognition, license plate visibility, and location-based profiling. While the service remains a powerful tool for navigation and exploration, it is now equally central to discussions around privacy, consent, and digital ethics.
What This Means for You
If you appear in a Street View image, you have the right to request it be blurred or taken down.
Private property visibility—even from a public road—can be contested under certain privacy laws.
This case may prompt greater user control and regulatory oversight for map-based services.
📖 For more on privacy rights, digital ethics, and tech accountability, visit allycaral.com
