Tag: controversy

Human Interest

Hindu Janajagruti Samiti Files Complaint Against Ranveer Singh Over Alleged Mockery of Sacred Daiva at IFFI 2025

allycaralgoa

A fresh controversy has erupted at the 55th International Film Festival of India (IFFI) after the Hindu Janajagruti Samiti (HJS) filed an official complaint against Bollywood actor Ranveer Singh. The organisation has accused the actor of insulting religious sentiments during IFFI’s closing ceremony in Goa.

According to the complaint, Ranveer Singh allegedly mimicked the divine form portrayed in the film Kantara – Chapter 1 and further referred to Chamundi Daiva, a revered Kotitulu deity, as a “female ghost.” These remarks, HJS claims, were disrespectful and amounted to derogatory comments against a sacred cultural tradition.

The HJS stated that the Daiva tradition, particularly in coastal Karnataka, is deeply rooted in spirituality, family lineage, and centuries-old rituals. Any misrepresentation, they argue, can hurt the sentiments of devotees and distort the understanding of indigenous cultural practices.

The complaint seeks:

  • A police inquiry into the actor’s statements
  • Appropriate legal action for hurting religious sentiments
  • A public apology from Ranveer Singh

The organisation also expressed concern that influential public figures must remain sensitive while representing cultural or religious symbols on prominent platforms such as IFFI.

Police have acknowledged receipt of the complaint, and further inquiry is awaited.

This controversy comes at a time when Kantara’s cultural impact has remained strong, especially among communities who consider Daiva worship a sacred responsibility rather than a performative art.

Further updates are expected as the matter progresses.

International

Paris Prepares to Tear Down the Eiffel Tower After 20 Years

Tanisha Cardozo

Paris stands at a crossroads — the city may soon bid farewell to the Eiffel Tower. Originally conceived for the 1889 Universal Exposition as a temporary iron structure, the tower was intended to be dismantled after 20 years. Though its permit was extended and the structure survived thanks to scientific uses and sheer popularity, now officials say the time has finally come to restore Paris’s classical aesthetic.

The move comes amid persistent complaints from locals that the tower is “ugly,” “out of place,” or a blight on the city’s architectural harmony. City planners argue that Paris should return to its tradition of Haussmannian facades, elegant boulevards, and harmonious rooflines — unspoiled by industrial iron frames piercing the sky.

Officials claim the Eiffel Tower has served its purpose: as a showcase of modern engineering, a magnet for tourists, and a communications platform. But they argue its continued existence undermines Paris’s identity and that the monument must go once the 20-year lease, which expires next year, lapses.

Heritage experts and historians, however, warn of the cultural cost. The tower has grown into a global icon — a symbol synonymous with Paris. To erase it could be to erase a piece of collective imagination. Some say future generations may scarcely know it existed. The debate raises deeper questions: how do cities balance preserving iconic structures with evolving civic identities? Where does the line lie between architectural purity and living heritage?

Previous generations saved the Eiffel Tower by converting it into a radio and meteorological station, extending its life beyond original intentions. Throughout its existence, it has undergone recurring renovations — repainting, structural audits, modernization of lifts and lighting — funded through tourism revenue and public investment.

Yet, dissent remains. Some residents see the tower as an ever-present oddity in a city defined by elegance. Others fear that removing it would be an irreversible act of cultural amnesia.

As Paris debates the fate of its most famous landmark, it confronts a central paradox: can a city truly flourish if it erases the very monuments that made it legendary?